Review and Federate Applications from Access Requests

Review and Federate Applications from Access Requests

Review and Federate Applications from Access Requests

This automation turns a federation request and its ticket attachment into a validated application setup proposal, routes it for approval, and, when approved, creates the application and processes requested group assignments. It keeps the ticket and approval channel updated when information is missing, approval is declined, or setup succeeds.

Identity Management

Provisioning

Access Control

Ticket Management

Trigger

A flowhook event containing the federation ticket information, ticket context, and ticket identifier triggers the workflow.

Outcome

The approved application is configured, eligible groups are assigned, and the ticket and Teams conversation receive the setup or exception results.

Trigger

A flowhook event containing the federation ticket information, ticket context, and ticket identifier triggers the workflow.

Outcome

The approved application is configured, eligible groups are assigned, and the ticket and Teams conversation receive the setup or exception results.

Before

An identity engineer would manually open the request and attachment, interpret the federation settings, and transcribe them into an application configuration. They would then request approval, update the ticket, check each requested group, assign valid groups, and communicate the outcome across separate systems.

How it works

  1. Receive the ticket request, retrieve its attachment, and analyze the protocol, required values, and requested groups.
  2. Send the setup proposal for approval, then update the ticket when details are missing or the request is not accepted.
  3. On approval, create the application, verify the result, assign groups that exist, and report the outcome.

Workflow details

  • Request intake: A ticket event provides the request details and ticket identifier. The workflow locates the corresponding request record and attachment, then retrieves the federation information needed for analysis.
  • Validation and preparation: The request is analyzed to identify the federation protocol, application label, owner, URLs, requested groups, and any missing or unsupported details. A setup proposal is prepared only from the information supplied in the request and attachment.
  • Approval routing: The analysis is sent to an approval conversation in Teams. The workflow uses the response to decide whether to proceed or update the ticket with a request for additional information when the proposal is not accepted or required details are unavailable.
  • Application setup: After approval, the workflow submits the prepared configuration to Okta, checks whether the application was created successfully, and records the application label, client ID, and metadata reference in the ticket.
  • Group handling and reporting: Requested groups are checked individually. Existing groups are assigned to the new application, missing groups are identified in ticket comments, and the group assignment results are reported back in Teams.

What changed

The request now moves from ticket intake through validation, approval, application setup, and group handling in one workflow. Automated checks determine whether required details and groups are available, while the approval decision remains a human-controlled checkpoint.

Work removed

Opening attachments one by one, transcribing federation settings, checking each requested group, assigning eligible groups, copying application results into the ticket, and manually posting status updates.

Expected outcome

Conservatively, at least four recurring manual actions are removed per request, including configuration transcription, group verification, ticket updates, and result reporting, subject to complete request data and approval.

Related flows

Related flows

Explore more workflows with similar topics or tools.

Automated Employee Offboarding

Automates employee offboarding by identifying recently changed employee records, checking whether offboarding is due today, removing qualifying users from Slack, suspending their Google Workspace and Okta access, and sending a detailed status email. This replaces a multi-system manual checklist with a consistent automated sequence.

Automates employee offboarding by identifying recently changed employee records, checking whether offboarding is due today, removing qualifying users from Slack, suspending their Google Workspace and Okta access, and sending a detailed status email. This replaces a multi-system manual checklist with a consistent automated sequence.

Explore use case

Explore use case

Interactive Identity Incident Remediation

This automation turns Teams security event messages into actionable remediation workflows, allowing authorized users to reset passwords, lock accounts, revoke sessions, investigate session identifiers, or route supported requests to specialized subflows. It updates the original incident message with the selected action, actor, and timestamp so the response remains visible in the incident conversation.

This automation turns Teams security event messages into actionable remediation workflows, allowing authorized users to reset passwords, lock accounts, revoke sessions, investigate session identifiers, or route supported requests to specialized subflows. It updates the original incident message with the selected action, actor, and timestamp so the response remains visible in the incident conversation.

Explore use case

Explore use case

Approval-Based Stale Access Key Governance

This automation identifies active IAM access keys that have not been used for more than 90 days, gathers the related user and issue evidence, and creates a trackable incident for review. It gives the responder a clear choice to deactivate the key or ignore the issue, then records the decision and closes the incident.

This automation identifies active IAM access keys that have not been used for more than 90 days, gathers the related user and issue evidence, and creates a trackable incident for review. It gives the responder a clear choice to deactivate the key or ignore the issue, then records the decision and closes the incident.

Explore use case

Explore use case

Less busywork. More possibility.

Let your agents handle the routine. Make room for what comes next.

Automation intelligence, delivered monthly.

Product releases, automation playbooks, and security research โ€” straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

ยฉ 2026 Mindflow โ€” All rights reserved.

SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
GDPR
France 2030
Bpifrance
รŽle-de-France

Less busywork. More possibility.

Let your agents handle the routine. Make room for what comes next.

Automation intelligence, delivered monthly.

Product releases, automation playbooks, and security research โ€” straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

ยฉ 2026 Mindflow โ€” All rights reserved.

SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
GDPR
France 2030
Bpifrance
รŽle-de-France

Automation intelligence, delivered monthly.

Product releases, automation playbooks, and security research โ€” straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

ยฉ 2026 Mindflow โ€” All rights reserved.

SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
GDPR
France 2030
Bpifrance
รŽle-de-France
To embed a website or widget, add it to the properties panel.